WTC CCTV: It exists. I've seen it. And now the Port Authority is denying it.
Published by reddit.com
A source is testimony, not proof. Citing one is a provenance fact — it records who said what, where — and never a verification that the claim is true.
Who is named
The characters and things this document talks about — 4 in alls. Each links to everything else the record knows about them.
Organisations 1
Places 1
Claims made
Every claim in this document. Firsthand = asserted on its own basis; secondhand = recounted from elsewhere, carrying no independent weight.
-
The author and a group of researchers arrived at the National September 11th Museum in October 2025.
In October 2025, a group of researchers and I arrived at the National September 11th Museum with a range of objectives.
-
CCTV footage from the World Trade Center on the morning of September 11, 2001 exists.
CCTV footage from the World Trade Center on the morning of September 11, 2001.
-
There are eight clips, each nearly 30 minutes to one hour long, that have been seen by no one.
No, not the single frame known to exist by a few, 8 nearly 30 minute to 1 hour clips that have been seen by no one.
-
The footage we were allowed to view was limited to the PATH station beneath the complex.
While what we were allowed to view (and what they had on hand) was limited to the PATH station beneath the complex, I was completely overwhelmed by what I saw.
-
The footage is high‑quality, color, and starts at 7:40 AM.
It was high-quality, color footage starting at 7:40 AM.
-
It captured thousands of faces of commuters passing in front of the cameras many of whom were certainly traveling up to the floors from which they would never return.
-
Nothing graphic or disturbing happens on this camera.
To be unequivocally clear, nothing graphic or disturbing happens on this camera.
-
There is no death, no injury, and no emotional distress captured in these files.
There is no death, no injury, and no emotional distress captured in these files.
-
The footage is "too sensitive" for anyone to see.
Yet, the Port Authority claims that this footage capturing the last images of countless individuals is "too sensitive" for anyone to see.
-
In the 25 years that the Port Authority has held this record, to our knowledge, not a single family has been notified that this footage exists.
-
These cameras represent the only visual record of the evacuations and interior conditions during the actual structural failures.
-
Because the Port Authority has failed to produce documentation proving they shared this footage with the official investigations, this withholding if true borders on a federal crime.
-
If true, the Port Authority’s withholding of the footage borders on a federal crime.
Because the Port Authority has failed to produce documentation proving they shared this footage with the official investigations, this withholding if true borders on a federal crime.
-
Information about the rest of the camera network remains unknown.
Information about the rest of the camera network remains unknown, but the surviving videos we know of range in camera numbers from 84 to 147, and tape numbers into the 2000s.
-
Information about the rest of the camera network remains unknown, but the surviving videos we know of range in camera numbers from 84 to 147, and tape numbers into the 2000s.
-
This means the 8 files we are aware of are just a tiny drop in the bucket of what was actually recovered from the rubble.
-
For now, I have shared an overview of our findings with a journalist, which is available to read here:
https://www.nj.com/news/2026/09/hes-seen-911-footage-almost-no-one-else-has-now-he-fights-to-make-it-public.html?outputType=amp
No claims match this filter.
What it cost
Reading this document into the graph cost <$0.01.
17 claims in all. Content fingerprint 5c4e9698af62… —
the document's text itself is not republished here; follow the link above to read it at
its source.