For news junkies, researchers & LLM prompting
Search to see what we have, or drop in a new link
Tap any ring to travel — the web turns to meet you.
What “connected” means
Type one name, and out comes —
None of it proven — all of it kept, with who said it attached.
The difference, one thing at a time
The news does the same handful of things to you every day. Here’s each one — what everyone else does with it, and what we do instead.
When an LLM or a news aggregator sees forty outlets running the same wire sentence, it reads that as strength — “widely reported,” “everyone’s covering it.” Repetition starts to look like proof.
We count it as what it is: one voice — one idea, echoed by many. It carries no more weight than a single outlet raising a competing idea. The forty copies collapse into one, and the lone counter-claim finally gets heard.
An AI hands you one smooth, confident paragraph. It reads like it knows — but you can’t see where any of it came from, and asking “how do you know?” just returns more confident paragraph.
Every claim wears the source it came from, and how much is genuinely unknown is shown as its own number — not smoothed away. You can walk any answer back to the document it stands on.
Someone said one thing in the spring and the opposite by summer. An AI blends the two into a tidy “their position evolved,” and the tension quietly disappears.
We put both statements side by side, each with its date and where it was said. We never call it anything — no “hypocrite,” no “flip-flop.” You read the two and feel the whiplash yourself.
A position gets reported on its merits — the arguments for it, cleanly laid out. The oldest question in the trade, who profits if this happens?, is left for you to wonder about on your own.
We keep the argument and who stands to gain in the same view — both sourced, no accusation. You see the position and the beneficiary at once, and draw your own line between them.
A story was everywhere in March, then quietly fell apart. An AI has no yesterday — ask today and the dead claim has either vanished, or worse, comes back to you as fact.
It’s still on our record, marked dormant, with the reason it fell. Nothing here is deleted — you can see what was believed, when, and exactly why it stopped being believed.
“Everyone’s reporting it” — forty outlets, all off one press release. Amplification looks like agreement, and a well-funded push can simply buy the appearance of consensus.
We trace it back to its single origin. The “consensus” and the lone claim it drowned out land at the same near-floor — both still unproven. Money buys distribution; it never buys evidence.
You just finished an article. An AI will happily summarise it — but it won’t tell you the thing you actually want to know: did this add anything, or did you just re-read what you already knew?
Drop the link in. In seconds: what’s new, what was already on the record, and what it collides with. Sometimes the honest answer is “nothing new” — and that’s worth knowing too.