part of: the surrounding story · about: border patrol agents
Did a border patrol agent violate Sam Tunick's constitutional rights?
exclusive promoted from measurement
About: border patrol agents · Sam Tunick
lens: Evidence-weighted Structural
The split — every branch
Under Structural there are no percentages at all: these are counts of how well tested each branch is, which is a different claim from how likely it is. Untested is not the same as refuted.
No answers have been linked to this Question yet. The unknown residual is the whole of it: assertions have been recorded, but nothing has been offered as an answer. That is an honest state of the record, not a missing page.
What would change this
Every inference behind these branches has had its standard challenges answered, and every branch has at least some evidence on it. What moves this Question next is new evidence, not an unanswered question already on the table.
Where this leads — the ranked narratives
Narrative ranking pending for this neighbourhood — the possible worlds through this Question have not been enumerated yet.
Recent developments
- New open question: Did a border patrol agent violate Sam Tunick's constitutional rights?see the page as it stood then
Sources bearing on this Question
No sources are recorded against this Question's branches yet.
Numbers on this page are computed under Structural (structural@1) — how belief is computed. Related views: the whole story · timeline · explore the narratives.
Machine-readable twins: Markdown · JSON · Atom.