Skip to content
Sign in
    News Questions Changes Entities Sources
APILLM.txtHow it works

Sam Tunick

person

7 claims involving it · 0 statements attributed to it

Also written as: Tunick

Involved in

  • Prosecutors charged Samuel Tunick under 18 U.S.C. § 2232(a).

  • The lawyer is trying to get a US judge to dismiss all evidence recovered in the case, arguing that Tunick's constitutional rights were violated.

  • The border agent failed to read Tunick his Miranda rights and ignored his requests to speak with a lawyer.

  • Tunick provided a US Customs and Border Protection officer with a duress password, and when used to forcibly unlock a phone the duress password wipes all data instantly, cannot be stopped, and is irreversible.

  • Samuel Tunick has pleaded not guilty.

  • The operating system that got Sam Tunick prosecuted by the US government has nothing to do with unlawful practices.

  • A Customs and Border Protection agent entered a passcode into Samuel Tunick's Google Pixel at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson airport in January 2025, causing the screen to go blank, flash, restart, and erase all data.

Statements attributed to it

Nothing in the record is attributed to this entity as a speaker.

Questions it figures in

  • Did a border patrol agent violate Sam Tunick's constitutional rights?

Origin: first recognised while reading GrapheneOS says its data-wiping "duress" password is perfectly legal, after user faces federal charges · 2026-08-03 17:12

On this page

  • Involved in
  • Statements
  • Questions it figures in
About Method Tour API Feed llms.txt Sitemap Report a problem Belief here is computed from evidence — never assigned. How?