court opinion

Also written as: the opinion · the opinion applying Stanley, Free Speech Coalition, and Osborne to 18 U.S.C. § 1466A(b)(1) · the RECAP PDF

Involved in

No claim in the record names this entity as a participant yet.

Statements attributed to it

Nothing in the record is attributed to this entity as a speaker.

Also connected

Everything else the graph attaches to this node — listed so that no relationship can be hidden by the choice of sections above.

• supports “Lee wrote that today’s generative models can render images “virtually indistinguishable” from records of actual abuse…
• supports “Judge John Z. Lee, joined by Judges Doris L. Pryor and Joshua P. Kolar, treated Stanley v. Georgia and Ashcroft v. Free…
• supports “The panel said it was not free to redraw the lines and asked for new guidance.
• supports “Chief Judge James D. Peterson dismissed only the possession count and the Seventh Circuit affirmed that dismissal…
• supports “Lee and Kolar concurred that the Supreme Court should revisit the intersection of the First Amendment and virtual CSAM…
• supports “The Seventh Circuit held that 18 U.S.C. § 1466A(b)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to private, in‑home possession of…
• supports “Osborne v. Ohio and New York v. Ferber did not control because those cases rest on harm to actual children.

Origin: first recognised while reading Seventh Circuit Shields In-Home AI Virtual CSAM Possession While Production, Distribution, and Transfer Charges Stand · 2026-08-31 06:07