Lee and Kolar concurred that the Supreme Court should revisit the intersection of the First Amendment and virtual CSAM if a proper case arrives.
No event time was recorded for this claim — the text gave nothing to anchor it to, and a guessed date would be worse than none.
Standing
lens: Evidence-weighted Structural
No belief has been computed for this claim under Evidence-weighted yet.
What bears on it
- supports court opinion
Shown to three levels; follow any claim to see its own structure.
Voices
- reddit.com independent
Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.
What the documents actually said
The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.
- Lee and Kolar concurred that the Supreme Court should revisit the intersection of the First Amendment and virtual CSAM if a proper case arrives.
He and Kolar concurred that the Supreme Court should revisit the intersection of the First Amendment and virtual CSAM if a proper case arrives.
Sources
- Seventh Circuit Shields In-Home AI Virtual CSAM Possession While Production, Distribution, and Transfer Charges Stand cited evidence
Who and what it involves
Origin: extracted from Seventh Circuit Shields In-Home AI Virtual CSAM Possession While Production, Distribution, and Transfer Charges Stand · 2026-08-31 06:07