Sign in
APILLM.txtHow it works

bears on: Who provided targeting data or technology to Iran for attacks on CIA… · bears on: Is non‑weapon support being provided to Iran? · bears on: What was the nature of the involvement in the attacks on Saudi Arabia? · bears on: Should Ghislaine Maxwell receive a presidential pardon? · bears on: How did intelligence failures contribute to the 9/11 attacks? · bears on: Who was responsible for the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? · bears on: Why did US intelligence fail to connect the dots regarding Khalid… · bears on: Who was responsible for the Nord Stream sabotage? · bears on: Who was responsible for the attacks on CIA facilities?

The White House categorically denied Hersh’s claims, calling them "complete fiction".

hedged in the source

White House categorically denied Hersh’s claims, calling them "complete fiction" Hersh Substack article

No event time was recorded for this claim — the text gave nothing to anchor it to, and a guessed date would be worse than none.

Standing

lens: Evidence-weighted Structural

2.9% belief under Evidence-weighted · -3.50 log-odds · derived, never stored

Every contribution to this claim's belief under Evidence-weighted. Starting point: the floor (-3 log-odds — an unsupported claim starts near zero, not at "maybe"). Contributions sum to -0.50; the result is -3.50 log-odds = 2.9%.
Direction What it rests on Base Leg CQ factor Contribution
challenge Hersh alleged that U.S. Navy divers, operating under the cover of a NATO exercise (BALTOPS 22) in June 2022, planted explosives on the pipelines, ordered by President Joe Biden.
evidential, independent leg #1 ⇒ ÷1		 0.5 #1 ×1 -0.50

0 evidentiary legs 1 source 1 challenge challenged

Questions this bears on

Bears on as evidence:

Who provided targeting data or technology to Iran for attacks on CIA facilities?

3 branches · 9 sources

— unknown — none of the above

Bears on as evidence:

Is non‑weapon support being provided to Iran?

3 branches · 10 sources

— unknown — none of the above

Bears on as evidence:

What was the nature of the involvement in the attacks on Saudi Arabia?

7 branches · 9 sources

— unknown — none of the above

Bears on as evidence:

Should Ghislaine Maxwell receive a presidential pardon?

1 branch · 4 sources

— unknown — none of the above

Bears on as evidence:

How did intelligence failures contribute to the 9/11 attacks?

4 branches · 3 sources

— unknown — none of the above

Bears on as evidence:

Who was responsible for the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

3 branches · 2 sources

— unknown — none of the above

Bears on as evidence:

Why did US intelligence fail to connect the dots regarding Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's alias “Mukhtar” before the September 11 attacks?

4 branches · 3 sources

— unknown — none of the above

Bears on as evidence:

Who was responsible for the Nord Stream sabotage?

7 branches · 3 sources

8.7% The UK Royal Navy was involved.
6.9% Tucker Carlson suggested that President Joe Biden could be responsible…
4.3% Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh publishes a self‑sourced article…
77% unknown — none of the above

Bears on as evidence:

Who was responsible for the attacks on CIA facilities?

2 branches · 7 sources

— unknown — none of the above

What bears on it

Shown to three levels; follow any claim to see its own structure.

Voices

Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.

What the documents actually said

The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.

Sources

Contradicted by

Claims that cannot both be true with this one. Contradictions are always shown from both sides.

Who and what it involves

Origin: extracted from Nordstream Pipeline Sabotage Timeline · 2026-07-18 09:56