The theory that the South Tower was not struck by flight 175 is widely referenced.
hedged in the source
Flight 175 was not struck by South Tower
No event time was recorded for this claim — the text gave nothing to anchor it to, and a guessed date would be worse than none.
Standing
lens: Evidence-weighted Structural
No belief has been computed for this claim under Structural yet.
What bears on it
Nothing supports or challenges this claim yet — untested, which is not the same as refuted.
Voices
- reddit.com independent hedged
Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.
What the documents actually said
The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.
- The theory that the South Tower was not struck by flight 175 is widely referenced.
that the South Tower was struck by not by flight 175
Sources
- 9/11 Evidence not covered by anyone cited evidence
Who and what it involves
Origin: extracted from 9/11 Evidence not covered by anyone · 2026-09-06 19:37