9/11 Evidence not covered by anyone
Published by reddit.com
A source is testimony, not proof. Citing one is a provenance fact — it records who said what, where — and never a verification that the claim is true.
Who is named
The characters and things this document talks about — 5 in alls. Each links to everything else the record knows about them.
Claims made
Every claim in this document. Firsthand = asserted on its own basis; secondhand = recounted from elsewhere, carrying no independent weight.
-
Thermite was covered but NOT video evidence which is key.
Thermite was covered but NOT video evidence which is key.
-
The dark spot means it was not UA175 Flight 175.
Dark Spot Means It Was NOT UA175 Flight 175
-
it was not flight 175
-
A firefighter fought nanothermite on 9/11.
Firefighter Fights Nanothermite on 9/11 WNBC Dub3 40
-
On Sept. 11, FOX News broadcast a live phone interview with Marc Birnbach.
On Sept. 11, FOX News broadcast a live phone interview with FOX employee Marc Birnbach.
-
Bernback saw the plane crash into the South Tower.
"Bernback" saw the plane "crash into the South Tower."
-
The plane did not look like a commercial plane.
"It definitely did not look like a commercial plane," Birnbach said on air.
-
I didn't see any windows on the sides.
"I didn't see any windows on the sides."
-
The theory that the South Tower was not struck by flight 175 is widely referenced.
that the South Tower was struck by not by flight 175
No claims match this filter.
What it cost
Reading this document into the graph cost <$0.01.
9 claims in all. Content fingerprint 2a3f890f68c4… —
the document's text itself is not republished here; follow the link above to read it at
its source.