The Seventh Circuit held that 18 U.S.C. § 1466A(b)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to private, in‑home possession of obscene AI‑generated imagery that does not depict an actual child.
2026-08-25 → 2026-08-26
Standing
lens: Evidence-weighted Structural
No belief has been computed for this claim under Structural yet.
What bears on it
- supports court opinion
Shown to three levels; follow any claim to see its own structure.
Voices
- reddit.com independent
Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.
What the documents actually said
The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.
- The Seventh Circuit held that 18 U.S.C. § 1466A(b)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to private, in‑home possession of obscene AI‑generated imagery that does…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held on August 25, 2026, in United States v. Steven Anderegg, No. 25-1354, that 18 U.S.C. § 1466A(b)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to private, in‑home possession of obscene AI‑generated imagery that does not depict an actual child.
Sources
- Seventh Circuit Shields In-Home AI Virtual CSAM Possession While Production, Distribution, and Transfer Charges Stand cited evidence
Who and what it involves
Origin: extracted from Seventh Circuit Shields In-Home AI Virtual CSAM Possession While Production, Distribution, and Transfer Charges Stand · 2026-08-31 06:07