Osborne v. Ohio and New York v. Ferber did not control because those cases rest on harm to actual children.
2026-08-25 → 2026-08-26
Standing
lens: Evidence-weighted Structural
No belief has been computed for this claim under Structural yet.
What bears on it
- supports court opinion
Shown to three levels; follow any claim to see its own structure.
Voices
- reddit.com independent
Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.
What the documents actually said
The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.
- Osborne v. Ohio and New York v. Ferber did not control because those cases rest on harm to actual children.
Osborne v. Ohio (1990) and New York v. Ferber (1982) did not control because those cases rest on harm to actual children.
Sources
- Seventh Circuit Shields In-Home AI Virtual CSAM Possession While Production, Distribution, and Transfer Charges Stand cited evidence
Who and what it involves
Origin: extracted from Seventh Circuit Shields In-Home AI Virtual CSAM Possession While Production, Distribution, and Transfer Charges Stand · 2026-08-31 06:07