Does the source have an interest in this conclusion?

speech act inferred — expert-testimony critical question · open

No event time was recorded for this claim — the text gave nothing to anchor it to, and a guessed date would be worse than none.

Standing

lens: Evidence-weighted Structural

— belief under Structural · — log-odds · derived, never stored

Every contribution to this claim's belief under **Structural**. Starting point: the floor (— log-odds — an unsupported claim starts near zero, not at "maybe"). Contributions sum to +0.00; the result is — log-odds = —.
Direction	What it rests on	Base	Leg	CQ factor	Contribution
Nothing has been counted for or against this claim. It sits at the floor — untested, which is not the same as refuted.

0 evidentiary legs 0 sources 0 challenges untested

Nothing supports or challenges this claim yet — untested, which is not the same as refuted.

No asserter is recorded for this claim.

Nobody asserted this. The model applied the expert-testimony scheme to premises already in the record, at derivation depth 0.

Premises:

Critical questions — the standard challenges to this kind of inference:

No source is recorded on this claim directly.

Origin: produced by scheme:expert-testimony@v1