Trump on Iran: “If Iran had nuclear weapons, we would contact them and say, "Sir, could we get together possibly? We would treat them very differently." (We wouldn't attack them) 🇰🇵NORTH KOREA vindicated again!

A source is testimony, not proof. Citing one is a provenance fact — it records who said what, where — and never a verification that the claim is true.

Who is named

The characters and things this document talks about — 3 in alls. Each links to everything else the record knows about them.

Claims made

Every claim in this document. Firsthand = asserted on its own basis; secondhand = recounted from elsewhere, carrying no independent weight.

• If Iran had nuclear weapons, the United States would contact Iran and say they would treat Iran very differently and would not attack Iran.

  If Iran had nuclear weapons, we would contact them and say, "Sir, could we get together possibly? We would treat them very differently."

  (We wouldn't attack them)

  Iran Trump

  Untested — nothing else bears on it yet

• North Korea is vindicated again.

  NORTH KOREA vindicated again!

  North Korea

  Untested — nothing else bears on it yet

No claims match this filter.

What it cost

Reading this document into the graph cost <$0.01.

2 claims in all. Content fingerprint d732584ac15f… — the document's text itself is not republished here; follow the link above to read it at its source.