Screenshots of the Mandela effect whistleblower to read

A source is testimony, not proof. Citing one is a provenance fact — it records who said what, where — and never a verification that the claim is true.

Who is named

The characters and things this document talks about — 1 in all. Each links to everything else the record knows about them.

Claims made

Every claim in this document. Firsthand = asserted on its own basis; secondhand = recounted from elsewhere, carrying no independent weight.

• I am not saying that the whistleblower's statements are true.

  i’m not saying what he said is true

  NoPirate9978

  Untested — nothing else bears on it yet

• The whistleblower's statements are a fun conspiracy to think about.

  it is a fun conspiracy to think about

  Untested — nothing else bears on it yet

• The whistleblower's statements are definitely interesting to the author.

  it’s definitely interesting to me at least

  Untested — nothing else bears on it yet

• I made a video.

  that video i made

  NoPirate9978

  Untested — nothing else bears on it yet

• I should have just posted the images here to read up.

  I should have just posted the images to read up here

  NoPirate9978

  Untested — nothing else bears on it yet

• If you want more screenshots, I will have to make another post.

  if you want more screenshots ill have to make another post

  NoPirate9978

  Untested — nothing else bears on it yet

No claims match this filter.

What it cost

Reading this document into the graph cost <$0.01.

6 claims in all. Content fingerprint 8fd2c7d0988a… — the document's text itself is not republished here; follow the link above to read it at its source.