Thomas Massie: “There are three dozen men's names redacted in this Epstein file. Presumably they were mostly witnesses interviewed. But Richard Kahn is one of the names. So is Leslie Groff. There's no reason their names should be redacted. Where are the interview notes?”
Published by reddit.com
A source is testimony, not proof. Citing one is a provenance fact — it records who said what, where — and never a verification that the claim is true.
Who is named
The characters and things this document talks about — 5 in alls. Each links to everything else the record knows about them.
People 3
Organisations 1
Things 1
Claims made
Every claim in this document. Firsthand = asserted on its own basis; secondhand = recounted from elsewhere, carrying no independent weight.
-
The Epstein file has three dozen men's names redacted.
There are three dozen men's names redacted in this Epstein file.
-
The redacted names were mostly witnesses interviewed.
Presumably they were mostly witnesses interviewed.
-
Richard Kahn is one of the names in the Epstein file.
But Richard Kahn is one of the names.
-
Leslie Groff is one of the names in the Epstein file.
So is Leslie Groff.
-
There is no reason their names should be redacted.
There's no reason their names should be redacted.
-
Thomas Massie posted the quote on social media.
Thomas Massie posted this on social media
-
Thomas Massie went to the Department of Justice to view the unredacted files.
he went to the DOJ to view the unredacted files
-
Thomas Massie saw Richard Kahn’s name on the Epstein file.
saw Richard Kahn’s name on this Epstein file
-
Thomas Massie cannot find the interview notes.
but can’t find the interview notes.
No claims match this filter.
Where it collides
1 claim in this document contradict another account. Collision is shown as structure — it never edits a belief, it makes the disagreement legible.
- Thomas Massie went to the Department of Justice to view the unredacted files.
collides with The DOJ only shares the file with conservative news stations. · Conservative Journalist Shared Unredacted Trump Accuser FBI Notes That DOJ Hasn’t Released
What it cost
Reading this document into the graph cost <$0.01.
9 claims in all. Content fingerprint 6c31214e75d9… —
the document's text itself is not republished here; follow the link above to read it at
its source.