Sarah Cotte Acquitted: Jury Rejects Charges Brought by the British State.
Published by reddit.com
A source is testimony, not proof. Citing one is a provenance fact — it records who said what, where — and never a verification that the claim is true.
Who is named
The characters and things this document talks about — 10 in alls. Each links to everything else the record knows about them.
People 2
Organisations 4
Places 2
Claims made
Every claim in this document. Firsthand = asserted on its own basis; secondhand = recounted from elsewhere, carrying no independent weight.
-
Sarah Cotte was acquitted by the jury at the Old Bailey.
On September 18, a jury at the Old Bailey unanimously acquitted Sarah Cotte
-
Sarah Cotte is a 22-year-old graduate of SOAS.
Sarah Cotte, a 22-year-old SOAS graduate
-
Sarah Cotte was prosecuted under Section 12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000.
who had been prosecuted under Section 12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000
-
Sarah Cotte was alleged to have supported Hamas.
for allegedly supporting the banned organization Hamas
-
The speech defended the right of the Palestinian people to resist occupation and genocide.
a speech defending the right of the Palestinian people to resist occupation and genocide
-
the broader campaign—waged by successive Conservative and Labour governments—to criminalize solidarity with Palestine
-
the state is prepared to go to control political speech and suppress opposition to Israel’s assault on Gaza
-
Sarah Cotte faced the threat of a 14-year prison sentence for three years.
For three years, Cotte faced the threat of 14 years in prison
-
Twelve jurors rejected the British State’s case.
Now, 12 jurors have rejected the state’s case
No claims match this filter.
What it cost
Reading this document into the graph cost <$0.01.
9 claims in all. Content fingerprint 4f37871a24c7… —
the document's text itself is not republished here; follow the link above to read it at
its source.