part of: the surrounding story · about: LG

What will be the impact of the NIH funding cuts on LGBTQ health outcomes?

open list promoted from measurement

open · promoted · 2 sources bear on this

About: LG · NIH

lens: Evidence-weighted Structural

The split — every branch

Under Structural there are no percentages at all: these are counts of how well tested each branch is, which is a different claim from how likely it is. Untested is not the same as refuted.

The branches, one by one

Experts warned that the cuts could worsen disease outbreaks.

◇ narrative ranking pending

Katie Edwards said six of her studies were canceled, including one testing online mentoring for transgender teens.

◇ narrative ranking pending

Over 320 LGBTQ-related studies were cut, affecting HIV and cancer research.

◇ narrative ranking pending

Researchers and critics argue the cuts are politically driven and will weaken care for a group that makes up nearly 10 % of American adults.

◇ narrative ranking pending

Simon Rosser said the moves have created a hierarchy of patients, with some seen as more worthy than others.

◇ narrative ranking pending

Supports

Nothing supports this branch yet — untested, which is not the same as refuted.

Challenges

Nothing argues against this branch yet.

What would change this

The evidence that would move this Question — read straight off the structure, not editorialised. These are the places where the model is explicitly waiting to be corrected.

Branches nothing has tested yet — evidence here would move the most:

Where this leads — the ranked narratives

Narrative ranking pending for this neighbourhood — the possible worlds through this Question have not been enumerated yet.

Recent developments

Sources bearing on this Question

Numbers on this page are computed under Structural (structural@1) — how belief is computed. Related views: the whole story · timeline · explore the narratives. Machine-readable twins: Markdown · JSON · Atom.