part of: the surrounding story · about: Meta

Is Meta liable for harming children?

exclusive promoted from measurement

open · promoted · 2 sources bear on this

About: Meta

lens: Evidence-weighted Structural

The split — every branch

Under Structural there are no percentages at all: these are counts of how well tested each branch is, which is a different claim from how likely it is. Untested is not the same as refuted.

The branches, one by one

The case was brought against Meta by 29 US state attorneys general, alleging the company deliberately designed addictive products that lured in young people and led to them being harmed.

◇ narrative ranking pending

Supports

What would change this

Every inference behind these branches has had its standard challenges answered, and every branch has at least some evidence on it. What moves this Question next is new evidence, not an unanswered question already on the table.

Where this leads — the ranked narratives

Narrative ranking pending for this neighbourhood — the possible worlds through this Question have not been enumerated yet.

Recent developments

Sources bearing on this Question

Numbers on this page are computed under Structural (structural@1) — how belief is computed. Related views: the whole story · timeline · explore the narratives. Machine-readable twins: Markdown · JSON · Atom.