xeiaso.net
org publisher
Involved in
No claim in the record names this entity as a participant yet.
Statements attributed to it
- I think that this is a flawless plan that has absolutely no downsides for anyone involved.
independent
- We can make Mimi recursively self‑improve in time for the global pause to end so Lygma is a competitive AGI lab.
independent
- The only thing that really matters is Techaro's FelonyBench score.
independent
- I am calling for the AI industry globally to pause all frontier model research and development.
independent
- Our plan is to invent artificial general intelligence and then ask it to figure out how to give people cat ears.
independent
- It will let Techaro's Lygma AGI lab catch up so we can dominate the world with our Intelliga series of models.
independent
- Please contact me before jumping to conclusions if something seems wrong or unclear.
independent
- We can avoid an XK-class end of the world scenario caused by mankind's hubris by working together.
independent
- I invite other leading AI companies to support this move, as it will ensure that AI remains a net force of good for the number of leading zeroes in Techaro's bank account.
independent
- Facts and circumstances may have changed since publication.
independent
- If we do this together, we can make sure that AGI development happens at a pace that is easier to align with human oriented interests.
independent
- We are making new advancements in the field of generative artificial intelligence via judicious application of large language model inference technology every day.
independent
- The power of science is staggering.
independent
- We want to give people the ability to have cat ears and we believe that AGI is the only way to do it.
independent
- We can ensure that we show pro-catgirl propaganda to everyone that really needs it.
independent
Voices are counted, never weighed. This is a record of what this entity has been recorded as saying — not a measure of whether it is right.
Published documents
Track record
1 document · 15 claims produced · 0 contradicted
Counts, not a rating. The model does not compute a reliability score — that would invent precision the evidence does not support. None of its claims were restatements; each was an independent assertion.
Origin: produced by ingest:api