We need to ask every single candidate running in the midterms, “Do you support the Massie‑Khanna Epstein 2.0 Transparency Act?”
Ro Khanna need to ask every single candidate running in the midterms Epstein 2.0
No event time was recorded for this claim — the text gave nothing to anchor it to, and a guessed date would be worse than none.
Standing
lens: Evidence-weighted Structural
No belief has been computed for this claim under Evidence-weighted yet.
What bears on it
Nothing supports or challenges this claim yet — untested, which is not the same as refuted.
Voices
- Ro Khanna independent
Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.
What the documents actually said
The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.
- We need to ask every single candidate running in the midterms, “Do you support the Massie‑Khanna Epstein 2.0 Transparency Act?”
“We need to ask every single candidate running in the midterms, “Do you support the Massie-Khanna Epstein 2.0 Transparency Act?””
Sources
Who and what it involves
Origin: extracted from Ro Khanna: “Thomas Massie & I have defied history a 2nd time, securing commitments for 218 signatures on Epstein 2.0. Two Democrats were sick and will sign the day Johnson calls us back in. We will not rest until the Epstein abusers are held accountable and there is justice.” · 2026-09-18 02:33