u/Shit_Paw is presently watching The Bombing of Pan Am 103
u/Shit_Paw is presently watching The Bombing of Pan Am 103 (documentary)
No event time was recorded for this claim — the text gave nothing to anchor it to, and a guessed date would be worse than none.
Standing
lens: Evidence-weighted Structural
No belief has been computed for this claim under Evidence-weighted yet.
What bears on it
Nothing supports or challenges this claim yet — untested, which is not the same as refuted.
Voices
- u/Shit_Paw independent
Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.
What the documents actually said
The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.
- u/Shit_Paw is presently watching The Bombing of Pan Am 103
I’m presently watching The Bombing of Pan Am 103 and immediately - first episode - when they started to look first into a Sikh man I said “mmm, I’ve seen this before” and went straight to Google to type “Pan Am 103 Flight Israel Involvement” because let’s be real we know what happened 9/11…
Sources
- Pan Am 103 was a 9/11 dry run cited evidence
Who and what it involves
Origin: extracted from Pan Am 103 was a 9/11 dry run · 2026-09-09 07:37