The editors’ note said the earlier version of the article included a statement intended to convey Israelis’ perception of the government’s military response to the Oct. 7 terror attack, but it was removed because of an editing error.

No event time was recorded for this claim — the text gave nothing to anchor it to, and a guessed date would be worse than none.

Standing

lens: Evidence-weighted Structural

No belief has been computed for this claim under Evidence-weighted yet.

Nothing supports or challenges this claim yet — untested, which is not the same as refuted.

Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.

The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.

The editors’ note said the earlier version of the article included a statement intended to convey Israelis’ perception of the government’s military response to…
“Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article included a statement that was intended to convey Israelis’ perception of the government’s military response to the Oct. 7 terror attack in relation to the attacks, but inadvertently suggested that Israelis’ experience as terror victims was a matter of perception. It has been removed from the article,” the editors’ note read.

Origin: extracted from NYT blasted for baffling Oct. 7 terror attack take, stating 'Israelis still largely view themselves as the victims' · 2026-09-17 01:50