It was worth trying to get the courts to unseal the documents because they were never properly sealed.

hedged in the source

No event time was recorded for this claim — the text gave nothing to anchor it to, and a guessed date would be worse than none.

Standing

lens: Evidence-weighted Structural

No belief has been computed for this claim under Evidence-weighted yet.

Nothing supports or challenges this claim yet — untested, which is not the same as refuted.

Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.

The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.

It was worth trying to get the courts to unseal the documents because they were never properly sealed.
"The lawsuit was settled in early 2017. I had been told the discovery contained d‑mning evidence against Epstein, Maxwell, and other men, and that it was worth trying to get the courts to unseal the documents on the grounds that they were never properly sealed in the first place."

Origin: extracted from New Epstein-Maxwell Evidence Could Be Exposed 'Soon' · 2026-09-11 21:52