Another source said diGenova was sharing “unrealistic expectations” with Trump about what the grand jury investigation could actually produce
hedged in the source
No event time was recorded for this claim — the text gave nothing to anchor it to, and a guessed date would be worse than none.
Standing
lens: Evidence-weighted Structural
No belief has been computed for this claim under Evidence-weighted yet.
What bears on it
Nothing supports or challenges this claim yet — untested, which is not the same as refuted.
Voices
- Another source independent hedged
Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.
What the documents actually said
The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.
- Another source said diGenova was sharing “unrealistic expectations” with Trump about what the grand jury investigation could actually produce
Another source told the Post he was sharing “unrealistic expectations” with Trump about what the grand jury investigation could actually produce.
Sources
Who and what it involves
Origin: extracted from Investigator Overseeing Probe Into Trump Opponents Breaks Silence On Abrupt Exit · 2026-09-13 06:58