A possession carve‑out in one circuit invites forum‑shopping, harder proof that a file depicts a real child, and pressure on platforms and Stability AI‑class vendors whose tools are dual‑use by design.

No event time was recorded for this claim — the text gave nothing to anchor it to, and a guessed date would be worse than none.

Standing

lens: Evidence-weighted Structural

No belief has been computed for this claim under Evidence-weighted yet.

Nothing supports or challenges this claim yet — untested, which is not the same as refuted.

Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.

The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.

A possession carve‑out in one circuit invites forum‑shopping, harder proof that a file depicts a real child, and pressure on platforms and Stability AI‑class…
A possession carve‑out in one circuit invites forum‑shopping, harder proof that a file depicts a real child, and pressure on platforms and Stability AI‑class vendors whose tools are dual‑use by design.

Origin: extracted from Seventh Circuit Shields In-Home AI Virtual CSAM Possession While Production, Distribution, and Transfer Charges Stand · 2026-08-31 06:07