A First Amendment holding about what may sit on a hard drive at home does not erase the harm model, the training‑data problem, or the fact that sending the same files to a real minor remains a crime.

No event time was recorded for this claim — the text gave nothing to anchor it to, and a guessed date would be worse than none.

Standing

lens: Evidence-weighted Structural

No belief has been computed for this claim under Structural yet.

Nothing supports or challenges this claim yet — untested, which is not the same as refuted.

Voices are counted, never weighed. How many people say a thing is structure worth seeing; it is not, by itself, a reason to believe it.

The verbatim text each extraction read before resolving it into this canonical claim. Quoted, never republished.

A First Amendment holding about what may sit on a hard drive at home does not erase the harm model, the training‑data problem, or the fact that sending the…
A First Amendment holding about what may sit on a hard drive at home does not erase the harm model, the training‑data problem, or the fact that sending the same files to a real minor remains a crime.

Origin: extracted from Seventh Circuit Shields In-Home AI Virtual CSAM Possession While Production, Distribution, and Transfer Charges Stand · 2026-08-31 06:07