# Is the causal generalisation itself well supported?
*Canonical page:* https://truthscore.com/claim/is-the-causal-generalisation-itself-well-supported--aab6d7c6
*Numbers under lens:* **Evidence-weighted** (`log-odds@1`)
*Machine twins:* https://truthscore.com/claim/is-the-causal-generalisation-itself-well-supported--aab6d7c6.md · JSON at https://truthscore.com/api/v1
Is the causal generalisation itself well supported?

## How it was derived

Nobody asserted this. Scheme **cause-effect** , depth 0.

**Premises**


**Critical questions**

- [open] [Could the outcome have arisen from another cause?](https://truthscore.com/claim/c0b9a2cc)
- [open] [Is the causal generalisation itself well supported?](https://truthscore.com/claim/aab6d7c6)
- [open] [Did the outcome actually follow the event in time?](https://truthscore.com/claim/46490cf1)